Talk:Propoxur

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 76.232.35.218 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

The article mentions "...potential toxicity to children after chronic exposure" and gives a reference. However, the NY Times article in the reference mentions nothing about the type of toxicity. The sentence needs to be modified, or the reference deleted. GB 69.158.182.93 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Columbus Dispatch reports that propoxur was licensed for home use until 2006, but that the manufacturer voluntarily gave up the licence because of poor sales. <http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/editorials/stories/2010/08/28/end-the-plague.html?sid=101> . If this is true it should be noted. -- Hu McCulloch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.232.35.218 (talk) 16:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply