Talk:Proposed directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights

Untitled

The 3rd paragraph contains unencyclopedic content and is quite NPOV. Not sure how to edit it to keep the facts contained within, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.64.232.42 (talk • contribs)

When do they vote on this?

Dsol 11:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Parliament does on 25/4.--As286 10:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Changes

I have cleared up the whole text, adding a few new sections and a summary of most common critical remarks, as they are heard in the press and in the academic articles.

I urge anyone interested in this subject to look at the legislative observatory (EU Parliament) and compare the original text with the subsequent amendments. It is astonishing how many amendments have passed and how truly appalling the original text is. --As286 10:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality

Sentences like "By rather wide academic, business and consumer consensus, IPRED2 is badly drafted." appear to be blatant neutrality violations. Please cite your sources. "All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias." Thanks. --Edcolins 19:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Offending statements removed. Sources added. Some sentences rephrased--As286 21:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawn?

According to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5263692, the directive has been withdrawn?

"As announced in Official Journal C 252 of 18 September 2010, the Commission decided to withdraw this proposal, which had become obsolete." 78.72.181.116 (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Proposed directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061222010703/http://www.ip.mpg.de/shared/data/pdf/directive_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_on_criminal_measures_aimed_at_ensuring_the_enforcement_of_intellectual_property_rights.pdf to http://www.ip.mpg.de/shared/data/pdf/directive_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_on_criminal_measures_aimed_at_ensuring_the_enforcement_of_intellectual_property_rights.pdf
• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20070802194053/http://www.ipjur.com/2005/07/new-proposal-for-european-parliament.php3 to http://www.ipjur.com/2005/07/new-proposal-for-european-parliament.php3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060705162442/http://wiki.ffii.de/IpredNlParl060629En to http://wiki.ffii.de/IpredNlParl060629En

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)