![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sourcing
editI was unaware that someone had deleted all of the text in here. This is trivial stuff to find sources for; virtually any text that discusses social insects. I've simply given one of the standards, there are many others. Just try this link: [1] to get some idea. Dyanega (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- You should take the time to figure out why such material was deleted. Per WP:BURDEN, the editor who originally added the assertions should have cited those claims: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed." Cheers. N2e (talk) 00:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)