Talk:Problem of mental causation

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Mind Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of mind

Commensensical Solutions

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In this section a few lines seem slightly less than NPOV ("It would be inhuman to claim otherwise"). Maybe just awkward phrasing/I'm misinterpreting. I'm drafting a few revisions, will edit soon if no one objects. --MvwYUym3 (talk) 22:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Idealism/panpsychism

Why is there nothing on Idealist positions on this subject?

Expansion & clean-up

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi all. I just tried to add a bit to this article. It was quite short before. The problem of mental causation is big in the philosophy of mind literature. It should be a well-developed entry on it's own. But, my additions are not great, so please edit, expand, and clean-up! - Jaymay 21:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Externalism

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I found this article tricky to follow. Particularly the section on Externalism - Can anyone clear up this explanation? --121.209.192.26 14:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic