Why No Anti-War Rhetoric Page?

edit

Is this yet more proof of Wiki's socialist/left wing bias? I think so. The reference materials used for this article are nothing more than manuals on how to be a left winger. Ymous 14:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Though the text is less impressive, there is substantial work of art and style given to all of the liberal motifs of peace, love, and homosexuality. Jessemckay (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a "Pro-War Rhetoric" page and an "Anti-War Movement" page, but no "Anti-War Rhetoric" or "Pro-War Movement" page. I would say the best course of action would be to delete this page and instead create a "Anti-War Movement" page. This would increase consistency and reduce bias. 74.105.10.169 (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Duties

edit

A declaration of war is an official act, usually not a rhetoric event, apart from the public announcement which addresses the masses to mobilize support. However, the popular "pro-war" rhetoric which isn't reflecting indoctrination and propaganda, is about patriotism, and the duties to fulfill to serve the country. Please try to edit less politicized. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Ronald Reid's Three Topoi into Pro-war rhetoric

edit

The article on Ronald Reid´s Three Topoi is very similar in content with the one on Pro-war rhetoric. In addition, it is an orphan. I propose to keep the Pro-war rhetoric article because it has a more general title and has a relevant number of incoming links Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply