 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editfrom VfD:
As for Anita no te rajes above. Deb 17:25, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Soap operas are minor (sorry, Mike H), and then this is Spanish language. The notability for an anglophone encyclopedia is lowered by that. Geogre 18:56, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I disagree that the fact that the EN-Wikipedia is in English should imply that topics should be in any way judged based on *their* language specificity. That said, this article is poorly written. I rewrote it as a better stub (poked around for basic info). Hopefully someone will fill in a lot more info, or can tell us if it's notable. Keep --Improv 20:12, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- And my point is that we serve the English speaking community. EN is not the master or the true Wikipedia. There should be a great deal of content on .SE or .CZ or .JA that isn't appropriate to .EN. That's not because it's not good information: it's because the items under description are not notable in the Anglophone world. It's not a value judgment. Do you think that the .DE folks are going to wonder about whether my new Peachoid is useful to them? I hope they don't. Geogre 01:24, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I always saw Wikipedia's different languages as being just a result of the fact that we don't all speak all languages fluently. Similarly, I think of EN as the "Wikipedia IN English", not "Wikipedia for the English". I don't see why one's language necessarily indicates what one will be interested in -- are Australians going to be interested in your Peachoid? Are Parisians likely to find towns in Quebec interesting? I do find this to be an interesting topic though, and am interested in further dialogue on it, in or outside this VFD. --Improv 17:38, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- And my point is that we serve the English speaking community. EN is not the master or the true Wikipedia. There should be a great deal of content on .SE or .CZ or .JA that isn't appropriate to .EN. That's not because it's not good information: it's because the items under description are not notable in the Anglophone world. It's not a value judgment. Do you think that the .DE folks are going to wonder about whether my new Peachoid is useful to them? I hope they don't. Geogre 01:24, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:59, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, send to cleanup. Any show on Telemundo is encyclopedia-worthy. -- Jmabel 00:49, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -Sean Curtin 03:01, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not true that any show on any network or syndicate is necessarily encyclopedia-worthy of an article. If this show is either very popular or attains a cult popularity and a good article appears, then that good article would belong here. Jallan 19:46, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, send to clean-up. RMG 22:53, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion'