This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Curious problem in the caption to the image. The correct spelling of the Greek word is ἹΣΤΟΡΙΑ; but the painter, getting it wrong, unequivocally painted ἹΣΤΩΡΙΑ. I'm in favor of at least captioning it with the correct Greek spelling, since the purpose of the caption is to inform the reader on Priscus, not on the painting? Bill 21:30, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
That is reasonable. Noting the misspelling would also be acceptable, I think. —No-OneJones(m) 21:33, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, Mirv. Perhaps it should be mentioned that Priscus may today be best known popularly as one of the two pseudo-narrarators in Gore Vidal's novel "Julian"? BarrettBrown 03:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Priscus was a Goth, not a Greek! It clearly states that in Jordanes's History of the Goths. I will make the necassary change.--Lucius Sempronius Turpio 06:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Personally, I don't care whether or not Priscus was a Goth or a Greek. I recommend providing a direct in-line citation (provide page number and direct quote please) when incorporating any information pertaining to the historian's background. If Jordanes states that Priscus was a Goth, then it is essential that you (or anyone) provide direct references. Deucalionite (talk) 01:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Concur, entirely. Thank you for the initial strong scholarly work that set this article on it good course. Cheers, Le Prof 71.201.62.200 (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
As was later corrected, no, he was not a Goth. Jordanes' error has been noted by historians such as Momsen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.29.1 (talk) 14:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
