Talk:Principia Ethica

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ethics
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

'Moore argues against consequentialism'??

That's totally wrong - Moore was a wholehearted consequentialist!!

Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ES8592, Melodyalvarado, Rrobertrowan, Avadauer123 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Trossi01, SimplyErinM19.

— Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic