Talk:Princess Productions

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Seems as if Princess Productions has devoted considerable time and effort into making sure this Wiki page is continually (average every 9-27 minutes) cleaned of any mention of culpability in the Arrse.co.uk debacle, whereby Princess productions hoped to make a pound by exploiting Britsh Soldiers and their families. It is obvious to anyone with even a layman's knowledge of Advertising, PR, or Corporate Policy that this sort of undertaking ( the original "pitch" on Arrse.co.uk) would NEVER be an unapproved venture undertaken by a junior staffer. Especially a junior staffer with "less than two weeks at the Company" This came from above. To disingenuously blame the most junior, and therefore most vulnerable member of the staff is meanspirited and reeks of cowardice. An admission of systemic failure in the areas of communication and ethics up the Corporate chain of command,a SINCERE apology from the turd who gave the OK on this harebrained idea, would have saved Princess Productions countless time, effort, and money. I would say a donation to either the Royal British Legion, Holidays for Heroes, or another Service Charity of their choosing would go a long way to undo the outrage and damage that their callous, crass and insensitive actions set in motion.

Comment edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While I do not agree with everything the above poster said, I believe it is appropriate for a properly-referenced mention of the so-called "ARRSE debacle" (for want of a better term) to be included in this article. Slurs and defamation against Princess Production staff are not appropriate on Wikipedia, or indeed anywhere, but the fact that the incident was reported by several major news sites including The Mirror and Anorak - and the fact that it forced an apology from a company with links to major broadcasting networks - means it deserves at least a passing inclusion. Princess should not be deleting the entry in its entirety simply to save face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.184.82 (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic