Talk:Princess Eugenie
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Princess Eugenie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
|
Untitled edit
Can somebody update the "alleged" event in 2003? RickK | Talk 20:37, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Meh, Jiang took care of it =P. ugen64 01:12, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
"Mrs Jack Brooksbank"?! edit
Are we stuck in the 50ies? Since when are women referred to by their husbands name anymore?? 78.55.75.134 (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- You may ask the same thing about the "Princess" part too. In any case, please do not pose the same question in two places. Surtsicna (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
As the article states, for better or worse that is how she is officially known in the court circular, and you may well find in some other official contexts. PatGallacher (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
RfC on Charles III edit
There is an RfC on Talk:Charles III#RfC: Inclusion of "Agnatic house" which may relate to this article. Feel free to contribute. Estar8806 (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Coat of arms edit
The notes state: "Coronet: a coronet composed of four crosses formy and four strawberry leaves.
" But this claim is unsourced. The illustration shows what appears to be a crown, not a coronet. Why is this? 86.187.239.160 (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It also seems that crosses formy are the same thing as crosses pattee. So not sure which is the more correct term and when. 86.187.239.160 (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, it's just a coronet as it does not have arches. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 08:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Coats of arms and copyright edit
A discussion is going on at the Commons concerning the copyright status of several coats of arms that are in use on pages related to British royalty. Please feel free to share your comments and input at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Coat of arms of Queen Camilla.svg. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 18:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
