Talk:Prince Edward Islands

Inhabitants

Do these islands have people living on them? XYaAsehShalomX 21:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

That depends on what you mean by inhabitants. There are scientists there. But, conventionally, islands whose only occupants are the staff of a scientific or military base are considered uninhabited. I think that the Falklands and Tristan da Cunha may be the only two isolated far southern Islands to be inhabited. -- Geo Swan 23:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Ah, OK! Thanks. I assumed there wasn't anyone living there, it's just that it didn't say so in the article. :) XYaAsehShalomX 23:47, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, today I deleteded a line of text from Provinces of South Africa. No mention of these islands is made in regular discussion of SA provices, but it makes one think.. Regards Gregorydavid 23:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC) PS are the Islands a province of SA?

They are not a province in their own right, but instead are a constituent part of the Eastern Cape Province.

Actually, I think you'll find that as far as they are part of any province, that province is the Western Cape: the government website here says:

"South African law as applied in the Western Cape is in force on Prince Edward and Marion Islands which, for the purpose of the administration of justice, are deemed to be part of the Cape Town magisterial district.".

The Prince Edward Islands Act, section 1.(2) states:

"For the purposes of the administration of justice, and in general for the application of the laws of the Union, the Territory shall be deemed to be situated within the Magisterial district which includes the City of Cape Town and to form part of the electoral division which includes the harbour of the City of Cape Town."

I've searched through the post-1994 legislation for the term "Prince Edward Islands", and I can't find anything that suggests that they are considered part of the Eastern Cape. - htonl 03:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Name

Does anyone know why the islands take their collective name from the smaller of the two? Roger (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Vela

The account of the 1979 Vela incident reads - to me - as suggesting that there was most probably a nuclear explosion. This is somewhat misleading, as there was no evidence of an explosion other than a blip in the Vela's data, which could easily have been a malfunction. There was no evidence of radiation, disturbance to the atmosphere, or seismic record. I suggest that the sentence to re-written to reflect the weight of evidence.203.184.41.226 (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

More recent information from 2017 and 2018 published studies: http://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/editorial/2018/05/remote_detection_of_nuclear_activities.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.245.162.131 (talk) 03:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Article about Vela https://getpocket.com/explore/item/blast-from-the-past?utm_source=pocket-newtab - baudeagle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baudeagle (talk • contribs) 23:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prince Edward Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151125032642/http://www.gardenroute.com/new-base-puts-sa-on-top-of-weather_article_op_view_id_6114 to http://www.gardenroute.com/new-base-puts-sa-on-top-of-weather_article_op_view_id_6114

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Prince Edward Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.btinternet.com/~sa_sa/marion_island/marion_island_history.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iol.co.za/capeargus/new-marion-island-base-opens-1043782
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210061607/http://lib.bioinfo.pl/meid%3A158214/pmid to http://lib.bioinfo.pl/meid%3A158214/pmid

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)