Talk:Priestley College

New Building

I thought the new building was being built for September 2007, not 2008. Surely it cannot take another seventeen months to finish when it's already practically got a roof. Cameronlad 10:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Assessment

Stub: This article has no references- these are essential. They should be independent from the college- ie not from the student contact book.--ClemRutter (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Priestley College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070303183926/http://www.warrington.gov.uk/traffic/concfares/student/default.asp to http://www.warrington.gov.uk/traffic/concfares/student/default.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108012227/http://www.priestleytraining.co.uk/ to http://www.priestleytraining.co.uk/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.edubase.gov.uk/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=130624

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Tone of the article

I've added a template message that is questioning the tone of the article. The article just seems to me like it is written like promotional material instead of like an encyclopedia entry. I am happy to discuss if anyone feels that this is a misuse of the template message as I'm not too sure myself. Cheers.

LocoMotionOfficial (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Article partially re-written - still in need of decent citations

I've done a bit of a re-write of the article. Some of this is because of out of date information, some because the article sounded like it had been copy pasted from the college's website. I've started with work on adding citations to back up the information being written, but I've had trouble finding sources that aren't written by the college itself. I ended up putting a couple of references to college material in anyway.

QuadColour (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC)