Talk:Pride Shockwave 2005

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 207.246.181.26 in topic 2005 Welterweight and Lightweight Grand Prix Brackets

Fair use rationale for Image:Shockwave05.jpg

edit
 

Image:Shockwave05.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

2005 Welterweight and Lightweight Grand Prix Brackets

edit

While looking at this event i noticed that there are no brackets available for viewing for these tournaments. Most of the other Grand Prix tournaments have brackets available for viewing on the event page in which the finals took place at. I feel that tournament brackets are a necessity for people to easily follow the tournament/Grand Prix accuratly. If someone could create such brackets for the Welterweight and Lightweight tounaments on this page it would be great. 207.246.181.26 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


can someone please fill in the brackets!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.246.181.26 (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply