Talk:Presupposition (philosophy)

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic / Analytic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Analytic philosophy

Value of this stub

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Seems like this is just a shorter re-iteration of the Presuppositional apologetics page, and doesn't really provide any information beyond that one example. The Presupposition page has more information, and this seems like it would make more sense as a section of that page rather than its own article. Or perhaps this could be augmented by information from the SEP page on presuppositions. --24.12.74.195 (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

More than that i also found the page quite loaded, saying that methological naturalism is indeed a Myth GorkamWorka (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic