Talk:Prescription monitoring program
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from NarxCare was copied or moved into Prescription monitoring program. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Sophia's Article Review
editGreat article so far! The background on why PMPs are important was particularly useful to the reader. One thing that I think could be added for further clarity is a section on the different schedule classes of drugs. I think that adding this could ensure that the reader understands the chart. Great job verifying such broad data! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgbroberg (talk • contribs) 01:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic tone
editThe History section of this article isn't written in an encyclopedic tone. Immediately, I see:
- "Legislation and initiatives cannot be uniform throughout the nation."
- "has secured six billion dollars"
- The whole diatribe about Missouri state politics, including "medically inept", "forces doctors", "would put the decision outside of doctors hands, for better or for worse", "at a cost to the Missouri people"
- "strengthen PDMP utilization by distributing PDMP data and increasing data sharing"
There are other problems, like the alphabet soup of acronyms, and the weasel words ("many doctors... essential"), but the tone sticks out to me the most. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.94.46.227 (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Merging in the NarxCare
editI would suggest to merge NarxCare into this arcticle. Geysirhead (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- merge done Geysirhead (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)