Talk:Preneet Kaur
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Gsingh in topic Problems with IP version
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Problems with IP version
editYour version is full with promotional words "prominent politician", "capital of her husband's former kingdom", "affluent", "a rare achievement in the days of the British Raj", "as Maharani of Patiala", and un enclyopediac lines " remained a back-bencher", and finally too much focus on her family. The article is about Preneet Kaur not her family. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 23:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- "Prominent politician" : Removed the word prominent
- "capital of her husband's former kingdom": Not promotional. On the contrary, this indicates that she had prior advantage over her rival candidates.
- "affluent": Her father simply was affluent. However, this is a relative term (compared to her later life) and so I have removed it
- "a rare achievement in the days of the British Raj": Do you deny this?
- "as Maharani of Patiala": Agreed. Phrase is removed.
- "remained a back-bencher": Nothing "un-encyclopedic" about this, but wording changed anyway to please you.
- Too much focus on her family: Disagree. Every bio-page gives info on family, and this info is correct and verifiable. It is also packed into one section. Feel free to add info about her own achievements, as long as they are verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.177.117 (talk) 11:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- "a rare achievement in the days of the British Raj": it does not matter what we believe, we need sources. And strong sources for these kind of statement, which explicitly says that yes this particular job was a rare achievement.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 13:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You talk of verifiability but yourself added lot of family information without any sources. So I have removed some of it. Please bring sources. There is still lot of unsourced stuff, so I have tagged it. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 14:22, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- The only information I have removed is that of Preneet Kaur's husband, sister, and sisters husband. These points are not relevant to the article, if you wish to create a new article about any of them please do so (if notable), with appropriate sources. I changed wording to bring it in line with other politicians articles on WP. If you have any suggestions to improve the wording please do so. But there is no need to revert the entire article. And please do not add irrelevant information, (eg. Why does someone who is reading about Preneet want to know what the sister's husbands job. You can create internal links to the respective articles and people can refer to the information there. Gsingh (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)