Talk:Preise, Jerusalem, den Herrn, BWV 119/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smerus (talk · contribs) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Well written

Overall absolutely acceptable. Two quibbles which I would raise:

• History and words - 'Bach could count on the entire council (his employer) listening, and likely also civil servants' - 'probably' is better than 'likely' in colloquial English.
• Scoring and structure - I suggest adding 'the musicologist' or 'the editor' before 'Alfred Durr' so that it is clear where this is coming from.

Verifiable with no original research

Well sourced and cited as one would expect from this editor.

Broad in its coverage, Neutral

Exemplary on both counts and well-focussed.

Stable

No problems

Images

Appropriate images and clear tables

Summary

I have no problems in passing this for GA, but the editor might like to take a look at the two quibbles under "Well-written".--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, done, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Excellent, super article.--Smerus (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)