Talk:Precinct of Amun-Re
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
_01.svg){kind=small}
Automatic Peer review edit
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
- The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.
- Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
- As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Markh 22:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Access edit
Please provide direct access under the title "Avenue of the Sphinxes" which seems to be the title instead of Corridor. See this article by Ann Wuyts: www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/excavation-and-restoration-on-the-avenue-of-sphinxes-1888212.html Thanks for a fine artcle, Rumjal rumjal 08:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumjal (talk • contribs)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Precinct of Amun-Re. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090605165359/http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/ to http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615095832/http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/index.php?page=actualites-01 to http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/uk/index.php?page=actualites-01
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Size Comparison edit
In the second paragraph it mentions "...and could accommodate 10 average European cathedrals.", does not make sense, how do you compute average size for cathedrals, is there any such thing as an average sized European cathedral, if so what is the size of such a thing? This part should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moughera (talk • contribs) 11:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)