Talk:Pragmaticism

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Work Area edit

Pragmatic Maxim edit

Began: Jon Awbrey 19:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I will use this area to develop some content on Peirce's pragmatic maxim, also known as the maxim of pragmatism or the maxim of pragmaticism, until it's whether it deserves a separate article or is better placed under either Charles Peirce, Pragmatism, Pragmaticism, or elsewhere. Now, please don't any Admins delete this while I go look up some sources.

Seven Ways of Looking at a Pragmatic Maxim edit

Ended: Jon Awbrey 19:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Footnote font size edit

The reflist 90% font size comes out to an effective 9pt in Internet Explorer but an effective 8pt in Firefox and most other browsers. The main idea was originally for bare citations. The footnotes in "Pragmaticism", however, are meant actually to be read. 9pt is okay for that. To get 9pt, 94% is best across browsers. 105% of the reflist font size has this effect. Or one could put "94%" font size around the older references tag. Either way. The Tetrast (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC).Reply

instrumentalism edit

Should this be compared with instrumentalism? Tkuvho (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This might be useful: Can you find a reliable source discussing the two ideas?
(IMHO/POV/OR(?)/Read at your own risk!: Instrumentalism seems to have been a degenerate version of pragmaticism, that was skeptical (or hostile) towards a central tenant of pragmaticism: the notation that the truth is "out there" and that it is essential to scientific progress to consider unobserved objects that cannot now be scientifically observed or tested, but that later scientists (or scientists of different species at different times and on different planets) could assess via experimentation.) Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
My comment on this grew long, so I put on my talk page User_talk:The_Tetrast#Pragmaticism_and_instrumentalism. The Tetrast (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC).Reply
However, Peirce criticized the instrumentalism of Ernest Mach (for being back-ward looking in summarizing previous ideas rather than in helping to find new laws): See pages 506-507 in
  • Stewart, W. Christopher (1991). "Social and Economic Aspects of Peirce's Conception of Science". Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Vol. 27, no. 4. Indiana Univerity Press. pp. 501–526. JSTOR 40320349. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |authorlinkNOPE= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |chapterNoShow= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |season= ignored (|date= suggested) (help)
However, Peirce applauded Mach's economic analysis of theories (information-compression).Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 22:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Pragmaticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply