Talk:Prab Gill
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Steel1943 in topic Requested move 15 August 2017
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 15 August 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Prabhdeep Gill → Prab Gill – WP:COMMONNAME. Although Gill ran with the name Prabhdeep on the ballot, he has been universally referred to in the media as Prab since his election. He also goes by Prab in his official legislative biography. Right now, Prab is a redirect and Prabhdeep is the article; those should be switched. Madg2011 (talk) 18:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Nominator is entirely correct about what happened here — his full name is what was reflected on the ballot, so it's where we started the article when he was declared the winner, but since he's been an officeholder the short form has become much more clearly the correct COMMONNAME. Bearcat (talk) 23:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- We don't actually have to do that at all — the rule is that the page title needs to be at the common name, but the page's content can use the full name if one is known. Bearcat (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: That's good to know! Just for my information, is there a policy stating that so I can either refer to it later or read up on it so I better remember this in the future? Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- MOS:FULLNAME clarifies how we handle it, if you want to read up on it. Bearcat (talk) 00:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks; until now, I thought that the article title always had to be in the lead. I may have seen exceptions in the past, but I cannot recall any off the top of my head. Steel1943 (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- MOS:FULLNAME clarifies how we handle it, if you want to read up on it. Bearcat (talk) 00:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: That's good to know! Just for my information, is there a policy stating that so I can either refer to it later or read up on it so I better remember this in the future? Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- We don't actually have to do that at all — the rule is that the page title needs to be at the common name, but the page's content can use the full name if one is known. Bearcat (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2017 (UTC)