Talk:Potteries derby/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I will review this. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, real life stuff getting in the way, I'll try to get it done on the weekend. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

No rush. EchetusXe 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

• What's the need for the mention of Crewe in the opening paragraph?
  • Removed.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• "said to have been formed in 1876", Said by whom?
  • By themselves, have amended.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• "Vale were complete unknowns", why?
  • They were a minor team that hadn't received any coverage before that.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• More detail needed about that court case
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• "annual Stoke v Vale", vs
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Why were Vale forced to reapply?
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• It needs to be clarified that the Britannia Stadium and Bet365 Stadium are the same
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• "trashed the away end at Vale Park", formalise the language
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• "Dave Brammer also turned out for Crewe Alexandra after being controversially sold to Crewe", 1, WP:OLINK for Crewe already being linked earlier. And 2, why was it controversial?
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Why are we mentioning the rivalry with Crewe in the players for both clubs section?
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  • No need to highlight in purple if you're removing the Crewe reference above
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• WP:OLINK on John Rudge
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Source 2, publisher title shouldn't be italicised as its not a print source and shouldn't be a bare web address
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Same as above for all non-print sources
  • Think I've done that.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Source 36, publisher title needs spacing
  • Same for 105
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Source 107 needs an access date.
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Source 111, needs a proper title and has a bare address as a publisher
  • Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@EchetusXe: It looks in pretty good shape. Just need those issues pointed out fixed, then please ping me and I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

-Thanks, I've looked at those.@The C of E: --EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

• • Then I am happy to say you have a new GA. Well done @EchetusXe:! The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)