Talk:Potteries derby/GA1
Latest comment: 6 months ago by The C of E in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
I will review this. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, real life stuff getting in the way, I'll try to get it done on the weekend. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- No rush. EchetusXe 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- What's the need for the mention of Crewe in the opening paragraph?
- Removed.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- "said to have been formed in 1876", Said by whom?
- By themselves, have amended.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Vale were complete unknowns", why?
- They were a minor team that hadn't received any coverage before that.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- More detail needed about that court case
- "annual Stoke v Vale", vs
- Why were Vale forced to reapply?
- It needs to be clarified that the Britannia Stadium and Bet365 Stadium are the same
- "trashed the away end at Vale Park", formalise the language
- "Dave Brammer also turned out for Crewe Alexandra after being controversially sold to Crewe", 1, WP:OLINK for Crewe already being linked earlier. And 2, why was it controversial?
- Why are we mentioning the rivalry with Crewe in the players for both clubs section?
- Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- No need to highlight in purple if you're removing the Crewe reference above
- Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OLINK on John Rudge
- Source 2, publisher title shouldn't be italicised as its not a print source and shouldn't be a bare web address
- Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Same as above for all non-print sources
- Think I've done that.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Source 36, publisher title needs spacing
- Same for 105
- Done.--EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Source 107 needs an access date.
- Source 111, needs a proper title and has a bare address as a publisher
@EchetusXe: It looks in pretty good shape. Just need those issues pointed out fixed, then please ping me and I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 07:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
-Thanks, I've looked at those.@The C of E: --EchetusXe 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Then I am happy to say you have a new GA. Well done @EchetusXe:! The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)