Talk:PostCapitalism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Older comments edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think this sentence belongs in the intro. It mere,y expresses a broad opinion and is not supported by any specific citation. Perhaps if properly cited it could go back in the section on "Reception". For now I am deleting, but its here if someone wants to add it back in a more appropriate way.

"Some say that he presents a future of utopian socialism.^{[citation needed]} But some others argue that PostCapitalism means nothing else but communism ^[1]"

--Betamod (talk) 15:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Ermak, Gennady (2016). Communism: The Great Misunderstanding. ISBN 1533082898.

Add topic

[1] Ermak, Gennady (2016). Communism: The Great Misunderstanding. ISBN 1533082898.

[1]