Talk:Positive pressure enclosure
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Alford Services offers a non-flexible overpressure enclosure with similar specs (http://www.alfordservices.com/haztec.htm) should this be included or listed separately since it actually is of wooden construction and not flexible/portable like the others listed here. 86.160.238.235 (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Anyone who feels like editing the so-called SPAM out of this page had perhaps consider that the inventions protected by patents are covered by education. It's a lot easier to destroy than it is to create. Smidoid (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Problems with article edit
This article suffers from an excess of industry buzz words, at first glance, and reads like a press release from a manufacturer. If it's patented spam, then it's going to go, btw, even though it's patented. htom (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please read external links, links to manufacturers are specifically prohibited. If that what you want to include, there is always dmoz. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) ] 17:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm done edit
I've made huge changes to this article. While I readily acknowledge my lack of expertise on this matter, it is quite clear to me that the current revision is far, far easier to understand than it was before. I came in and read this the first time and didn't even know what it was about. I have no problem with someone else with more knowledge fixing it up after me, but it needs to not be read in industry jargon, and it needs not to have unnecessary links to the companies that make these wonderful products. I'm out of here. Unschool (talk) 02:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Underwater edit
These devices are not used underwater! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.34.73 (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)