Talk:Portugal at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1
Latest comment: 6 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Going to take on this review. MWright96 (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
edit- "their attendance has been sporadic, with the nation" - reword to country for variety
- "the cross-country skiing competitor Danny Silva. Silva was chosen as" - try not to start the beginning of the following sentence like this
Cross-country skiing
edit- "He had previousily represented" - typo; previously
Another short and neat article. Not too many issues this time round as usual. MWright96 (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind words, MWright96. Issues have been addressed. Courcelles (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Okay then. This article now has GA status. MWright96 (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)