Talk:Portland Alliance
This article was nominated for deletion on May 7, 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Citations needed
editA couple statements currently cite the Portland Alliance website, but need additional citations from independent sources. They are the circulation of 22,000, and the "award-winning series on health care and homelessness in the 1990s". I was unable to find any sources outside the Portland Alliance website for these two facts in my lengthy search a few months ago; anyone know any possible leads? -kotra (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Concerning the circulation, I think it may be possible to find another source. The Oregonian cites an independent source, for example (though the Oregonian is many times larger than the Alliance, so that may not be a good comparison). -kotra (talk) 20:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I found a few sources: 21,000, 8,000, 8,000
- The second two are probably inadmissible, as editorials, whereas I think the first may qualify as a reliable source, at least in conjunction with the Alliance website citation. Unfortunately though, the two editorials confirmed my suspicion that the "22,000" figure is greatly disputed (unless the paper somehow nearly tripled its readership in a couple years). I've added the first citation, but the WW editorials make me uneasy... -kotra (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Those are really interesting. How did you find them? Did you search Google Books separately and the Willamette Week separately? (I'm interested in helping with citations and so it's a web research question.) Thanks again for looking at this article so much - it's really helping me. Tdferro (talk) 00:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the slow response. I did a normal Google search for "Portland Alliance" circulation (this). Your results may vary (if you're logged into a Google account, it will personalize the result ranking). Other places I use to find sources are Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, newspapers' websites directly, or WorldCat. -kotra (talk) 03:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Portland Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070820055654/http://www.kgw.com:80/news-local/stories/kgw_082903_news_chief_quits.54cc2b82.html to http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_082903_news_chief_quits.54cc2b82.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)