Talk:Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act

Water Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Desirey12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Outline feedback edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Desirey,

This looks good and I'm glad you're building a new page on Porter-Cologne. My only concern is that it should complement, and not mirror too much, the SWRCB page.

Julianfulton (talk) 16:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Desirey,

It looks like you are on the right track so far. You have included the history, mission, and basics of the policy. The content is neutral and has reliable sources of information. Eventually, it will need more sources, but for now, the State Water Resources Board is a good start. The page states the most important information without going into too much detail and it is pretty straightforward. The sections seem to be chronologically ordered. I like how it has the history first and then goes into other details. As a suggestion, I would make the introduction one solid paragraph and then go on to break up it into sections (although I understand you may have already planned on doing that). Haleywalters23 (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Haley. I appreciate the feedback. I will make sure to add that introduction paragraph and will look for more resources to help grow the page.

-Desirey — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.41.119.97 (talk) 04:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic