Talk:Port of Singapore

Contradiction with other page

This article claims that the Port of Singapore is currently the busiest port by tonnage, the article on the Port of Shanghai claims that it has been the busiest port by tonnage since 2005. Only one of these claims can be true. I reference this comment on the Port of Shanghai talk page.

Stephen.G.McAteer (talk) 07:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

This article contradicts itself, and it contradicts another Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world%27s_busiest_ports_by_cargo_tonnage). The second sentence states that it is the second-busiest port in the world by tonnage. Reading farther down in the "Operations" section, it states it is the busiest. Finally, on the page listed above, it shows it as the third busiest. Two pages, three different answers. The World Shipping Council lists Singapore as the second-busiest, coming in just behind Shanghai (http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/global-trade/top-50-world-container-ports) Stimers (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Transport

How is freight moved to from the port; truck, train, plane???? and if by car what road does it use to get there? and if by rail what railway line is used? and what airport for a plane??? 220.253.106.21 (talk) 14:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

PSA is not the world's busiest port

Please read the report from the Tamasek Review, which claims that "Shanghai’s container traffic surpassed Singapore’s last year, making the wealthiest city of China the world’s busiest port as the economy churns out more goods for export and draws in greater trade flows" Here is the link: http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/08/shanghai-surpasses-singapore-as-worlds-busiest-port-as-trade-volumes-jump/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalal0 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Port of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219070734/http://www.schahryar.com/kool/singaporeportcam/ to http://www.schahryar.com/kool/singaporeportcam/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210181437/http://www.mpa.gov.sg/infocentre/portstatistics/portstats.htm to http://www.mpa.gov.sg/infocentre/portstatistics/portstats.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)