Talk:Port-Royal Logic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Logic / Modern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Logic
	Modern philosophy

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Is this the same as the "Port Royal Grammar" mentioned in linguistic works? AnonMoos (talk) 08:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, both are by Antoine Arnauld, but the grammar was co-written with fr:Claude Lancelot and the logic with Pierre Nicole. Srnec (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Referring to your note on Foucault's the Order of Things, wasn't it the classical episteme, not the modern one? W-Zen (talk) 06:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic