Talk:Pond Eddy Bridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Oh my! You Americans are so alike—you always forget to establish context through naming the country ;) Otherwise, nothing a tiny copyedit could not fix. Just note the difference between a hyphen (-) and an endash (–). The latter is used for ranges (when something is in between two other things), eg. $7–8 million, Pennsylvania–New Jersy boarder.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   No problems. Congratulations with yet another good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)