Talk:Polyozellus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly and concisely written b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Is broad in areas covered b (focused): Stays on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: No OR

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

This is an excellent little article, nicely written. Wonderful illustrations. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 22:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)