Talk:Political colour
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AmerIHCan in topic Political Colour
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Political colour article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Political Colour edit
Do not move again. On wikipedia the American English spelling is used. ~~ Frvwfr2 19:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ENGVAR before making similar changes. VMS Mosaic 20:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. (dot)com is US... US commerce, so all on (dot)com should remain US standard. Enough of the imperialistic rhetoric... we are not ruled by the empire and never will be again. History is history and it should not be changed or redefined by an online "encyclopedia" AmerIHCan (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
I tried to get the talk page back but it still has one redirect. Perhaps someone else can clean it up? VMS Mosaic 20:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct that we don't move pages between varieties of English, but please do not correct a move by simply copying the article back to the old location and creating a redirect. Doing that breaks up the article's history. I'm straightening up the move now. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I messed up trying to correct the move before discovering the right way to do it. VMS Mosaic 23:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)