Talk:Polish–Swedish union
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 10 July 2017
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Unia polsko-szwedzka 1592-1599 from pl.wikipedia. Translated on 15 November 2006. |
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Poland–Lithuania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 18:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 10 July 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved — Amakuru (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Polish–Swedish union → Swedish–Polish union – By dynastic precedence, since the ruling monarch was of a Swedish royal dynasty. Compare Swedish equivalent article. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know anything about "dynastic precedence", but Wikipedia naming convention is based on alphabetical order unless there's a common English-language name. See WP:PLACE#Order of names in title. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 11:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per MShabazz. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per MShabazz. Also compare equivalent Polish article, which puts Polish first. UninventiveWithUsernames (talk) 12:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.