Talk:Podostemaceae
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2601:141:2:9E92:21FA:D07B:C7D5:1C47 in topic broken external link
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Podostemaceae article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Genera edit
Oh dear, another one of these unreferenced lists vomited up from an unknown source. Where did that list of genera come from? How authoritative is it? Is it complete? Does it contain errors? Does anybody have time to give it a thorough editing, and maybe add a few half-decent references? MrDarwin 17:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Bitter, are we? :-). Most of the hits in Google Scholar seemed to be from subscription-only journals (especially Aquatic Botany). Most of the articles seemed to be either about a particular species, about the placement in Malpighiales or a few about the internal classification of the family. I did switch to a regular internet search, and found some decent articles which included an introduction to the family, which I have now added to the article, but nothing as detailed as a list of genera. As for our list of genera, we could perhaps just delete it, unless we think someone is really going to turn any of those redlinks into decent articles, or even just use the list for reference. Kingdon 15:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
broken external link edit
The external link to the Masahiro Kato page returns a 404 not found — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:141:2:9e92:21fa:d07b:c7d5:1c47 (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)