Talk:Po (river)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AntientNestor in topic Warships

Untitled edit

Po River, and alot of information about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.217.223 (talk) 12:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is this really the most-likely page that someone visiting "po" would be interested in? Surely Polonium is much more likely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.179.180.160 (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

- Absolutely. The Po is one of the largest rivers in Europe, as compared to a relatively minor element? (Not to say that Polonium is not important, but certainly it is more obscure than the largest river in Italy.) Lu3ke 01:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

added {{for}} to polonium. Jake the Editor Man (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

lowland padana geology edit

lowland padana geology: http://coseinteressanti.altervista.org/water.pdf Po river http://coseinteressanti.altervista.org/geology.pdf lowland padana geology — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.24.84.232 (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

These links are dead and gone. Requiescant in pacem.Dave (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Italian unpaged ref edit

  • Saltini Antonio. Dove l'uomo separò la terra dalle acque. Storia delle bonifiche in Emilia Romagna, Diabasis, Reggio Emilia 2004, Rome, Turin, Trulli.

Hi buddy, you gave us no page number on this and it is in Italian so I am putting it here until we can figure out what to do with it.Dave (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

216.232.3.51 (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Po (river). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Warships edit

I have tagged a claim that the 2022 drought revealed warships in the river as {{dubious}} because the supplied reference is to low water in the Danube: From the depths of the mighty Danube River, the hulking wrecks of more than a dozen German World War II ships have risen once again, exposed by a drought that has starved Europe’s rivers and led to some of the lowest water levels of the past century.

A bomb in the Po is mentioned later in the story, found by fishermen. --AntientNestor (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deleted again.--AntientNestor (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
But it's back. A contributor using this IP address has a history of edit warring and has been blocked twice for it.[1]--AntientNestor (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply