Talk:Po (lateral thinking)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Po (lateral thinking) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to "Po (term)" edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I believe the move is in order, as the current title "provocative operation" is just one of the operationalisations used by Edward de Bono. --Gurubrahma 10:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Inaccessibility, notability, fringiness, and/or bias edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I can't really understand this article because it seems to be written as a refresher or summary for people who already understand the concept. That needs to be changed to explain the concept better to people who have never heard of it… if the article is worth keeping:

Because the references are all from the same person, who is also the only person mentioned in the article as having studied/written about this concept, I'm not sure it's notable. It may be a fringe theory. The article may also be biased against the mainstream views even if its subject is not a fringe theory. I can't fix this stuff myself because I don't understand the concept. –PointyOintment (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hard to understand edit

Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I do agree with others that this article is very confusing. I am not familiar with the subject, so I cannot judge its fringiness/notability. However I did delete the paragraph about interjection which was for me, completely impossible to understand. I moved what could be salvaged from it in the lead. Shiningandenchanting (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic