Talk:Plectus parvus

A fact from Plectus parvus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 September 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the tiny nematodes Panagrolaimus detritophagus and Plectus parvus were revived after more than 30,000 years frozen in permafrost?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panagrolaimus detritophagus, Plectus parvus.

Wikipedia

Animals Low‑importance

Plectus parvus is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Reference 3 edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Why is Reference 3 marked as a dead link? The url [1] works for me. Also, why was the authorship information and article name removed? the reference previously read "Weisberger, M. (2018). Worms Frozen for 42,000 Years in Siberian Permafrost Wriggle to Life. Retrieved from https://www.livescience.com/63187-siberian-permafrost-worms-revive.html" which is compliant with APA guidelines for citing websites. The reference currently reads "[https://www.livescience.com/63187-siberian-permafrost-worms-revive.html] {{dead link|date=September 2018}}" making it a bare URL that is not compliant with Rule D3. Why was this change made? --HighFlyingFish (talk) 21:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

With no explanation forthcoming I have restored the reference to its original form. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic