This

edit

Tihs page reads like an ad. It tells me nothing useful, only who to buy them from and how "great" they are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.222.10 (talk) 13:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possible image

edit
 

I believe that this image shows a swing (seat) with a natural rock for the part you sit on. I'm not sure (and I wrote the description for the image at Commons; the uploader hasn't responded to me), but perhaps someone here will know more about it than I do. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2 2012, I think the page looks a lot better than when it was suggested for deletion or merging. Right now it looks rather nice, especially the density of links to academic articles. Good job. Id vote to keep and to not merge — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.125.251.13 (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Page fundamentally attracts promotional material

edit

It strikes me, looking at the history, that this is a page that fundamentally attracts promotional language from people with highly probable conflicts of interest. Contributors to this article include:

Now, I figure that people usually write about what they know, but a few of these are, or are really darn close to being, violations of NOR. I would submit that "playscapes" are notable enough for Wikipedia, if only because designing them is apparently such a competitive field that so many people are compelled to use Wikipedia as ad space. I also submit that it would be a good idea to protect this article from new and unregistered users. Shmuser (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply