Talk:Play It Again, Brian

Play It Again, Brian was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 26, 2012). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Animation: Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

1

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Play It Again, Brian/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 04:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.
"The episodes follows Peter and Lois, who are going through a tense time in their marriage..." this wasn't part of a two-part series or anything, so it should just be 'episode,' right?
Is there a promotional image we can use for the infobox?
There's a section in the infobox for guest actors, which I think should be included since there are so many, and their characters could be listed too.
Plot section: It would help if you put the voice actors in parenthesis after the characters they perform.
"Peter immediately begins enjoying himself, as being very annoying." -- I don't understand this, either.
"...and since then he has been criticized for the style of humor that he brings to the show." -- Are you talking about Herbert or Mike Henry?
It might also help to include a little on the deleted scenes you mention in the DVD release.
Cultural References: Isn't the Cleveland/Black Box scene parodying a music video? If so it should be mentioned.
Checklink tool is showing minor issues with several links, see if you can fix them.
Dablink tool returns no problems with disambiguation pages.

I am placing the article on hold pending the above improvements. —Ed!^(talk) 04:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I reviewed the article 10 days ago, and pinged the editor seven days ago. Having seen no response in terms of either edits or a response, I must fail the article for GA. It will need to be renominated once it meets the criteria. —Ed!^(talk) 13:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic