Talk:Plastic surgery/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by LT910001 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 05:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your (2) edits to this article, Nikkilopezsuarez. Good articles are reviewed against six criteria. They are here: WP:GA?. On first glance this article is not close to meeting these criteria. In particular:
- The lead section is too small. It should reflect and summarise the article contents. See WP:LEAD
- Numerous sections lack citations. Active tags are present that request citations
- Many sections are small and consist of a single sentence or two
- The article is US-centric
- There is a large list that should be converted to text
- There is barely any discussion of complications or risks
In addition, I note you are a student and wish you well with your studies, but based on past experiences will not hold my breath for any response. I'll hold this review open for some days and then if there is no response mark it as failed. All the best, --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Failed per above.--Tom (LT) (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)