Talk:Planet of the Dead/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Vicenarian in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks! Vicenarian (T · C) 20:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

(It appears this page was created erroneously several months ago by an unregistered user. Unregistered users are not allowed to perform GA reviews, per WP:GAN. It does not appear this user registered so as to review, or that any other registered editor has stepped in. Accordingly, I have taken over the review.) Vicenarian (T · C) 20:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pre-GA Questions, Comments and Other Reviews

edit

None prior to the review. Vicenarian (T · C) 11:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA REVIEW - Fail

edit

 

This article fails the "stability" GA criterion, as it is still undergoing significant alteration and, in fact, appears to have been the target of a recent edit war. Please renominate when a general consensus on its content has been reached.

Please leave any questions or comments regarding this review here on this page in the section below so they may be visible to all. Additional reviews are also welcome. Any editor who disagrees with this assessment may follow the reassessment procedures at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment. Thank you! Vicenarian (T · C) 11:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Post-GA Questions, Comments and Other Reviews

edit

To clarify my reasoning for the failure, I believe that while repeated reversion due to vandalism should not disqualify an article from GA status, reversions caused by disagreements over whether good faith content conforms with our content policies is another matter. These matters should be discussed on the talk page to encourage consensus building over the article's content.

In sum: When it is clear there is ongoing disagreement over good faith article content, I believe the article cannot be listed as a GA until the disagreement is resolved through means other than multiple reversions. Thank you. Vicenarian (T · C) 14:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply