Talk:Pit (nuclear weapon)

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Please use sections edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a great start of an article, but currently it's one gigantic read without any breaks. Articles are greatly helped when they are divided into section (history, general principle/design, types of pits/cores, applications, etc...). Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 15:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

A lot of it is duplication from Nuclear Weapon Design. SkoreKeep (talk) 22:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dispute pit size edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The section says modern pits have a radius of ~5cm. This is wrong.

We have a small number of photos of pits from a B61 being handled showing big +10cm radius pits [1]. These pits are roughly half the diameter of their AT-400A storage container, and the container is 20 inches in diameter [2]. Kylesenior (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

1 - https://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/workers-package-an-at400-container-at-the-pantex-plant-news-photo/1409065

2 - https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/enviro/eis-0225/eis0225_f.html

Add topic