Talk:Pisces-class deep submergence vehicle

Pisces II- current fate

I put in the passage that said that Pisces II was at "Deep Marine, a Maritime museum in Vancouver, Canada." It came from the Ranaan source cited in the article. I have since looked at the vancouver maritime museum site, and saw no mention of Pisces II, nor could I find it at a "Deep Marine" facility in vancouver. It is a puzzlement- maybe Ranaan is bad info? -J JMesserly (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

1973 Pisces III rescue

Maybe more could be made of the 1973 Pisces III rescue (maybe its own page), by taking some info from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23862359? (Beatpoet (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC))

Not a bouyancy tank

The staement that a "bouyancy tank" flooded is incorrect.The part that flooded was a "machinery sphere" which is a smaller metal hull that contains equipment behind the main hull. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.143.44 (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pisces-class deep submergence vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080409020550/http://www.submarinesonstamps.co.il:80/openhist.php?ID=130 to http://www.submarinesonstamps.co.il/openhist.php?ID=130

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)