Talk:Pioneer 11

Untitled

Pioneer 11, launch date April 5 1973, insisted of April 6? -201.250.0.176, 19:06, 3 April 2006

it was launched at 2 o'clock in the morning; it could have been reported as the 5th —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Current spaceflight?

The probe was lost 13 years ago. Surely the infobox about it being a current spaceflight whose details may change should be removed? Thoughts? --Dbutler1986 (talk) 11:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, this statement should be updated:

, "Pioneer 10 continues to return scientific data and may have enough power to last until 1999."

Surely we know, as is recorded for Pioner 10, the last time we contacted it succesfully?

IceDragon64 (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Pioneer 11 - Saturn - p176.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pioneer 11 - Saturn - p176.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Launch and Trajectory

The section is entitled launch and trajectory, but says little about its trajectory. From a picture of Pioneer 11's path, it looks like it was launched directly on a Hohmann transfer orbit to Jupiter, but I haven't been able to confirm this besides from the map. Anyone know for sure if it was a Hohmann transfer orbit? Cheerioswithmilk (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Inconsistent Information

The times and distances of the various encounters given in the text body differ from those in the tables. Especially bad is the "near-miss": the text gives the body as probably Epimetheus, but then gives the time and distance as Janus. The table is completely different from this information. This really should be corrected. CFLeon (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pioneer 11. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101120084730/http://astronautix.com/craft/pior1011.htm to http://astronautix.com/craft/pior1011.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Skypath of Pioneer 11

Please generate a starmap of the skypath of Pioneer 11 similiar to that for Voyager 1, which can be seen on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Voyager_1_skypath_1977-2030.png !

Should the whole article be rewritten into past tense?

As the contact to the spacecraft was lost two decades ago, maybe we should do the same thing as for other wikipedia articles about satellites whose mission has permanently ended, that is, change the tense of the article into past tense.El Roih (talk)