Talk:Pinocytosis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Non-specific, adsorptive pinocytosis page were merged into Pinocytosis on 21 October 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
3 forms of endocytosis? edit
The article on endocytosis only lists 2 processes, pinocytosis and phagocytosis. What is the third form? Whatever it is, add it to the endocytosis article please. If not, please change it to only 2 forms until input is received. Tyciol 07:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- The third type is receptopr-mediated endocytosis (clathrin-mediated or claveolin-mediated). The article seems confused. IT one place it recognises that these are different. In another, it says they are forms of pinocytosis. I have attempted to clarify this. The article is also sorely lacking in references.
- Marchino61 (talk) 06:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
the third type is pinocytosis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.188.230.200 (talk) 07:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Non-specific, adsorptive pinocytosis edit
Definition of pinocytosis seems to encompass the content at Non-specific, adsorptive pinocytosis. Should we merge that article into this one? Ringbang (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Done
Cell drinking edit
Apparently, another word for this is “cell drinking”: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Cup o’ Java (talk • edits) 04:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Why does "pinocyte" redirect here? edit
Word not used in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 01:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Endocytosis edit
Endocytosis is the transport of material in to the cell across the plasma membrane.They are two types of endocytosis phagosytosisand pinocytosis
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pinocytosis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Rated "high" as high school/SAT biology content. - tameeria 00:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 00:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
No violation edit
The link submitted only has free abstract. It’s open part issued by publisher . The closed part (copyrighted) is neither seen nor taken.
Please revert as no violation Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
No copyright violation edit
The reference of free abstract of article is only cited in article. The free abstract is openly available by publishers and this is science. The matter written is science and theory thereof open to public.
No violation, please revert . Wikiblogmaster (talk) 21:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC)