Talk:Pink slime/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Encycloshave in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Encycloshave (talk · contribs) 14:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tick box edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   overall, but a few  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Review Comments edit

  • Reliable sources:
    • "Seven Million Pounds of “Pink Slime” Beef Destined for National School Lunch Program" is a Yahoo blog, which which may not meet the standards of WP:IRS. What do we know of the editorial control and reliability of Yahoo writers? And what do we know about Sarah B. Weir?
    • A few bits are sourced from company-run sites, but most are duplicated by reliable news sources.
  • Neutrality: Neutrality issues raised on the talk page seem to have been addressed.
  • Stable: There seemed to have been some concerns in April, but they seem to have been addressed.

Cheers! Encycloshave (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply