Talk:Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by DivaKnockouts in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DivaKnockouts (talk · contribs) 21:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • Link studio album
  • "Released less than one year after the original, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up features eight newly-recorded songs and an exclusive behind-the-scenes footage DVD." — Hm, lets say exactly how many months it was released after the original.
Background
  • "She began working on the album in 2011 and was finished recording in early 2012." → "She began working on the album in 2011 and was finished recording by early 2012."
  • "...Minaj worked collaborators..." ← What?
  • The album's lead single "Starships" became Minaj's most successful and most certified single to date, becoming one of the best-selling singles of all time and making US Billboard history after debuting in the top ten and then spending a total of 21 consecutive weeks in the top ten of the Hot 100. — Remove the second occurrence of the word "most".
New material
  • Who is Cassie? Provide information for the uninvolved reader.
Singles
Critical reception
  • At Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up received an average score of 72, which indicates "generally favorable reviews", based on eight reviews. → On Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded – The Re-Up received an average score of 72, which indicates "generally favorable reviews", based on eight reviews.
Commercial performance and subsequent sections
  • Everything looks good.
References
  • FN#1 — No italics to Allmusic
  • FN#2 — No italics to Digital Spy, needs author
  • FN#3 — Is this reliable?
  • FN#5 — No italics to iTunes Store (US), the title should be "iTunes - Music - Pink Friday ... Roman Reloaded (Deluxe Edition) by Nicki Minaj"
  • FN#6 — Needs author
  • FN#7 — No italics to Allmusic
  • FN#15 — No italics to MTV News
  • FN#19 — Publisher should be Vibe Media Group
  • FN#21 — Link The Los Angeles Times, needs publisher
  • FN#23 — Remove the stray symbol in author's name.
  • FN#24 — Delink The Los Angeles Times, always link something the first time you use it, needs publisher
  • FN#25 — No italics to Allmusic
  • FN#26 — No italics to iTunes Store (US), title should be iTunes - Music - The Boys - Single by Nicki Minaj & Cassie
  • FN#27 — A full reference is needed.
  • FN#29 — No italics to iTunes Store (CA), title should be iTunes - Music - Freedom - Single by Nicki Minaj
  • FN#32 — No bare references. See FN#27
  • FN#33 — No italics to MTV News
  • FN#34 — Same here
  • FN#35 — Publisher needed (Phoenix Media/Communications Group
  • FN#36 — Publisher needed (Independent Print Limited)
  • FN#44 — No italics to iTunes Store (US), title should be "iTunes - Music - Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded the Re-Up by Nicki Minaj"
  • FN#46 — No italics to French Albums Chart, add publisher (Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique
  • FN#47 — No italics to Spanish Albums Chart, add publisher (Productores de Música de España)
  • FN#48 — No italics to Australian Recording Industry Association
  • FN#49 and #50 — No italics to iTunes Store (US), title should be "iTunes - Music - Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded the Re-Up by Nicki Minaj"
  • FN#51 — Link Amazon.com

There we go. Putting article   On hold until minor issues have been addressed. Regards. — DivaKnockouts 22:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done all. However, I left the MyPinkFriday reference in because it's actually Minaj's official website. WikiRedactor (talk) 22:59, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Great job with the article. Now is a GA.  PassDivaKnockouts 23:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.