This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why is this article called "Pin..." (with an ellipsis, or three dots, at the end)? Although this name, appearing in an external link, is repeated with the ellipsis, the title of the film seems otherwise to be simply referred to as "Pin", with the alternative title "Pin, a Plastic Nightmare" being mentioned also.
If the main title really does include the ellipsis, then it should be so shown wherever it appears; otherwise I would think the ellipsis should be removed from the title and from the one or two other places where it occurs. M.J.E. (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I could find no sources showing the ellipsis, and only sources showing "Pin" or "Pin, a Plastic Nightmare", so i will move this article. I suspect the article creator used the ellipsis as a compromise between the two titles, and to make it easier to link to (no piping needed). if true, its clever but not encyclopedic. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is incomplete and its sections remain underdeveloped. Sections such as those on the film's production, release, and reception are way too short and need to be expanded in more detail than what they currently have with citations given for any added information. Every article has the potential to make GA, or FA status if enough attention is given to them including this one. Hopefully this article gets the attention it so desperately needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
