Talk:Pillnitz Kleinzschachwitz Ferry

Reverted conversion to redirect

I have reverted User:Goodraise's conversion of this article to a redirect. As Goodraise chose not to give a reason for this action, I'm not sure what grounds the conversion was done on. However I think this is a perfectly good stub article. Like all stubs, it could do with further development and more cites, but it is a start. And moving the information to Dresden Transport Authority, as Goodraise did, skews that article.

If you feel you have a good case against this article, please tell me what it is. -- Starbois (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Schloßfähre vs. Schlossfähre

I changed the spelling to Schlossfähre in the first sentence. It seems not be the name of the ship but of the line, so the new german spelling scheme (neue deutsche Rechtschreibung) applies. In the later part of the article it seems to be the ships name, but it is not very clear. --Adornix (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pillnitz Kleinzschachwitz Ferry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070513072712/http://fjordfaehren.de:80/bi/binn_s1.htm to http://www.fjordfaehren.de/bi/binn_s1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)