Talk:Pilina unguis

A fact from Pilina unguis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Paleozoic monoplacophoran Pilina unguis was twice as large as any known living monoplacophoran?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

Wikipedia

Animals Low‑importance

Pilina unguis is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

A prominent block of the Latin of the original description is not suitable for a general readers' guide, such as Wikipedia.--Wetman (talk) 01:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you are right that long non-English text are not much suitable. Luckily this type description is short, anybody can easily skip this and availability of this is necessary for further improvement of the article. Meantime it can stay as it is because it still provide few more or less useful information: how long the Lindström's description was, that he mentioned island Fårö and also other species of monoplacophoran and so on. Also this article is in continuous improvement as any other wikipedia article. Wikipedians will translate it into English in the future and then we will see what do do with it. --Snek01 (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm also not sure whether the latin belongs in the article. If this was an article about anything else then we certainly wouldn't put a big chunk of a foreign language in the article in case someone can translate it. How about moving it to here? Smartse (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic