 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2007. The result of the discussion was Merge and redirect. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
The sources are given. There is nothing in the article so far (March 2007) that cannot be found in the public domain. I don't know if he yet has professor status but he is heading in that direction if he has not. He has been a university lecturer and researcher for over 25 years and one of his computer programmes is used by the Australian Ministry of defence. I would say that he is a fairly important fellow. His baronetcy adds to that. David Lauder 16:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Name of this article edit
Shouldnt this article be called Piers Lauder?--Vintagekits 17:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Move edit
See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
- Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--padraig 11:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)